Saturday, 26 October 2024

Every Angel Is Terrifying



I have always had an admiration for moody, blurry, grainy, expressionistic black and white photography, as practised by people like Chris Friel, Trent Parke, Irma Haselberger, or (a recent discovery via Tomasz Trzebiatowski's Photosnack) Olga Karlovac. I have no talent for it myself, and my many attempts over the years have rarely made it into the "keepers" box. Which is fine: much as I enjoy listening to Glenn Gould play Bach, I can barely tap out "Happy Birthday" on a keyboard. We are who we are, and I suppose I'm just not a moody, blurry, grainy, expressionistic sort of person. To invert Joni Mitchell, I'm not frightened by the devil, but I'm drawn to those ones who are afraid.

So, talking of the devil [checks behind his left shoulder, oh so casually: nothing... Must be busy today...] I've been doing my own, rather different monochrome thing with some angels I've been meeting around the place, as part of a longer-term angelic project. As mentioned previously – and I'm beginning to wonder, after sixteen years of blogging, whether there's anything I haven't mentioned before, at least once – I've been having fun with some cheap second-hand compact cameras, the sort that offer a ridiculously huge built-in "super zoom" range, inevitably coupled with so-so image quality. Or, in the case of the intriguing Canon Zoom device, truly appalling image quality (see the post Zoom!).

These little compacts fit comfortably into a coat pocket, though, and I enjoy being able to wander about, relatively unencumbered, and choosing between getting up close, taking a broader view, or isolating tighter compositions out of the middle distance; something I'd never do if I had to tote around the Fuji X or Micro 4/3rds equivalent of a 24-800 zoom, even assuming such a beast exists and I could afford one. 


The fact is that you can discover an awful lot of useful post-processing tricks when you try to rescue interesting images of inferior quality, tricks that will also find application in your more usual work. With these angels – spotted doing their apotropaic and tidings-bearing thing in various locations – I have converged on a range of monochrome "looks" that I find both satisfying and appropriate. Moody, blurry, grainy, and expressionistic they're not – don't think I haven't tried – but angels, after all, are ambassadors of clarity and light. Apart, that is, from the ones who are not. About whom, the less said the better.

For beauty is really nothing
but the onset of a terror we can only just endure,
and we marvel at it so because it serenely disdains
our destruction. Every angel is terrifying.

(Denn das Schöne ist nichts
als des Schrecklichen Anfang, den wir noch grade ertragen,
und wir bewundern es so, weil es gelassen verschmäht,
uns zu zerstören. Ein jeder Engel ist schrecklich.)

from Duino Elegy 1, by Rainer Maria Rilke (my translation)

Here's my favourite angelic annunciation, by the way. Greetings! 



10 comments:

Stephen said...

I quite like these black and white images, Mike.
Of the photographers you list here, I was only aware of Trent Parke. (I think I had one of his books before I went mad and threw half my collection out.)
Talking about black and white, I bought from eBay (For £33) a Minox 35 mm camera, which I will put some Tri-X through, as soon as I have it in working order. I looked at some sample images from the Minox on Flickr, and was aghast at just how grainy 35mm looks most of the time. I'd forgotten, and we are spoilt by the image quality from modern digital cameras.
Anyway,
Cheers.

Mike C. said...

Stephen,

Yes, 35mm film is rubbish, can't understand why anyone feels it's worth the effort and expense!

Mike

Stephen said...

I wonder why I bother with film sometimes too, Mike.

Mike C. said...

Try medium format? I had a lot of fun in the late 1990s with a Fuji 6x4.5 camera, as well as some old folders using 120 film in 6x6 and 6x9 versions.

Mike

Stephen said...

Yes, I have a nice Rollei, but I've been neglecting it lately in favour of digital. I also occasionally do a bit of 4x5 photography, which I enjoy, though it's a bit fiddly. I just fancied this Minox because it's tiny, and the idea of carrying it around in my pocket appealed to me. But I think the image quality might be, as you say, rubbish.

Kent Wiley said...

I know I'm showing my parochialism, but the clip from the much ballyhooed "Angels in America"?, without any context, is as commenters point out, batshit crazy. How does one play awe and wonder? Mouth agape? That's certainly one way...

Mike C. said...

You didn't enjoy Angels in America, then? I think this scene is one of the most memorable things I've seen -- I quite like batshit crazy -- and certainly demonstrates why angels are not to be taken lightly... ;) Emma Thompson is perfectly cast, as is pretty much everyone else.

Mike

Kent Wiley said...

I guess its moment has passed, and I missed it. My own damn fault.

Mike C. said...

So much to see, so little time... And it was a long time ago, 2003! I haven't even seen The Sopranos or Breaking Bad (yet!)...

Mke

Kent Wiley said...

Exactly. No Sopranos here either. B.B. is great, but you might skip ahead to "Better Call Saul." Resonates better having seen Breaking B., but you could also watch them out of order. Once again, a major time commitment, which is my issue with 99.44% of series drama.