It seems there are so many wannabe artists out there, all looking for the stylistic edge that will be distinctively "theirs" – their brand, their trademark, their signature style – that, like the parallel evolution of sabre-toothed dentition or bristling defensive spines, even the weirdest novelties will be thrown up independently any number of times. If you have banked heavily on the uniqueness of your own innovations, then the unwelcome discovery of a stranger's footprints all over what you had considered your private turf can induce annoyance, and even paranoid, violent, and litigious thoughts. Alternatively, you can just let it go, and write it off to experience. I'm a porcupine, you're a hedgehog, that weirdo over there is an echidna: let's all get along!
More than a decade ago, I wrote about an instance of this that paralleled my own efforts, in the post Snails in Outer Space. Now I've come across an even more striking example.
You may remember me describing my interest in deconstructing cardboard packaging last year (Cut It Out; hey, listen, a man needs a hobby). It had occurred to me – how could it not? – that these oddly-shaped sheets of card would make an interesting series of surfaces for some visual art, whether as an actual "support" for painting or drawing, or scanned as an element in digital art. So I decided to scan a few, cleaned up the shapes, and then superimposed some digital patterns onto them, just to see how it would look. TBH, it wasn't anywhere near as interesting as I'd hoped, and the whole idea went onto the back burner, along with a dozen other such potential ways of occupying the hours between breakfast and bedtime. Maybe later, maybe not.
4 comments:
Wow, those are really not interesting at all, are they?
It's clearly a guy with no ideas, who's mashed up every gimmick he can think of into an incoherent "process" that means nothing because in the end he has no ideas about anything *except* Byzantine process.
amolitor,
Nope, truly terrible stuff, I think. It's a shame, as Photo-Eye used to be a go-to site for me, but someone working there now has very poor taste, verging on kitsch.
Mike
Actually, I'd say what we see here is a guy with nothing but ideas. There's no process on display other than minimal digital skills. The ideas are pretty minimal too.
Carl,
It's a measure of what seems to be happening to Photo-Eye that this sort of stuff is not only getting past the gatekeepers, but getting featured. Ditto the rather twee constructed work they seem to like now. It's hard to see how this can stand alongside, say, Pentti Sammallahti or Raymond Meeks.
Or maybe I'm just getting old...
Mike
Post a Comment