Saturday, 10 April 2010

White Noise

Yesterday I paid a visit to the same expanse of white shuttering that yielded one of this year's Christmas/New Year cards. If anything, it's improved in the intervening period. A temporary but substantial hoarding around some building work, it was crudely painted to start with, and the weather and various human agencies have been to work on it ever since.








It's a curious (and perhaps instructive) fact that no-one has better taste or judgement than the processes of weathering and erosion constantly at work on the world around us. It's also curious that we are here to appreciate that fact. If I were feeling grandiose, I might wonder whether there is a flaw in theories of entropy that assert that the universe aspires to the condition of a uniform grey sludge. If that is our destination, however, we are clearly taking the scenic route.

3 comments:

Gavin McL said...

Sometimes we use random waves to test the behavior of ship models - these waves are effectively white noise, but because they are confined in a tank they are not quite white noise, they "off white" but rather than being called grey noise they are called "Pink Noise" waves quite why I don't know.

It's strange how decay "suits" photography.

doonster said...

"I might wonder whether there is a flaw in theories of entropy that assert that the universe aspires to the condition of a uniform grey sludge"
Indeed there is. Entropy tends towards maximum radomness, which actually means lots of clumpy bits, which causes all the interesting stuff.
IMO, the deeper truths of science show Nature to be more sublime that we can ever image.

Mike C. said...

Sorry guys, thanks for the comments, I've been away for a week.

"pink noise" sounds intriguing, I'm going to tuck that away for future use...

"the deeper truths of science show Nature to be more sublime that we can ever image" -- I think this is partly why I'm not a fan of the "hi-fi" approach to photography. What is interesting (in any art form) is the humanity of the gestures, not their accuracy.

Mike