data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c19f2/c19f2c38051fa75d7f50a6177b9d310d7e8bef0e" alt=""
The long lens, used from a slightly elevated position, gets in amongst the branches in a way I could never achieve with my feet on the ground in front of its magnificent bulk. The foregrounding and isolation of decorative detail puts me in mind of the nineteenth century sketches of the likes of John Ruskin and Edward Lear. The flattening perspective of the telephoto lens comes in handy, too, for sculptural juxtapositions like this one:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae06d/ae06d1e267c0dc6777df08f93ba221189bf0b30a" alt=""
Or it can compress the reflections in a campus window into something like a painter's canvas:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90fae/90fae4ecc1bf563f684a9be6b67b8f48f635f16c" alt=""
That two-dimensional look is something I always find attractive in a photograph. At heart, I suppose, I'm still a drawer and painter who uses photography.
2 comments:
The third shot might qualify for your flag series, Mike. But the first two are knockouts. Particularly appealing is the way the lighting in the first shot reinforces the two dimensional rendering. Although there is plenty of contrast in the scene, somehow the depth cues are obfuscated. Fine photography.
Thanks, Leigh -- I like the way you put it ("there is plenty of contrast in the scene, somehow the depth cues are obfuscated") -- that's a perfect description of what I'm after in this kind of shot.
Mike
Post a Comment