Friday, 6 October 2017

Something Grand



Printed at 300 dpi this thing would be 120cm x 58cm: it's quite big. Properly framed, it would be even bigger. In fact, by my standards it's monstrous, and way beyond the capacity of my A3+ printer. But I either had to choose between those two kingfisher pictures, or put them together somehow. The idea of a triptych seemed an obvious way to do it.

If you think this picture is a little strange, either in concept or in execution, bear in mind that Hieronymus Bosch's famously weird Garden of Earthly Delights is a triptych, designed to be used as a folding altarpiece. I used to have a poster of the full triptych blu-tacked onto my teenage bedroom wall – believe me, in the 1970s Blu Tack was a really exciting new innovation – and it probably exercised more influence on my imagination and subconscious than I'm prepared to admit. The Bosch, I mean, not the Blu Tack, obviously.* I love the fact that, when closed, the reverse sides of the triptych's outer panels combine to show an image of a flat, foggy world spellbound within a translucent bubble, rather like those plastic balls in vending machines that contain toys, sweets, and other gimcrack delights.

All I need now is a patron prepared to have the thing manufactured on an appropriately grand and luxurious scale. I'm thinking a hand-made hinged frame, and gold, lots of gold. It's at times like these that one truly feels the absence of the deep and generous pockets of the mediaeval church. Thanks a lot, Martin Luther!

* Although only now do I realise that I've used a repeated blob of BluTack for the border of the central panel... Thus worketh the subconscious mind.

2 comments:

  1. That is quite glorious. I do not, alas, own a wall well suited to it and I am not sure anyone not already Royal does.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks! I thought so, too, although "WTF? LOL!" came to mind as well.

    Obviously, I can print it smaller, and have in fact just ordered a 75cm wide version as a poster from Vistaprint, just to see what it would look like. Something is going on, though, when you start thinking of 75cm as the "small" version... I suspect those vast exhibition halls at the Royal Academy may have entered my soul.

    Mike

    ReplyDelete

Comment policy: All comments are welcome, but will be moderated (i.e. read by me before publishing). This may take time. Only comments which add something constructive to the post in question (and which will be of interest to other readers) will be published. Spam will be hosed out, and its originators hunted down. Thanks.