Monday, 15 June 2026

The Scenic Route


I came to driving later in life than most – I was 30 when I passed my driving test – which, added to an admittedly neurotic sense of loyalty and a deep-seated reluctance to spend money on cars, means I have owned relatively few cars over the years, all of them bought used (very used, in some cases), and kept until the end of their useful, lawful life. Let's see: two Minis, a couple of bangers – a Nissan and an Austin Rover, bought off people at work that lasted just a couple of months each – and a Vauxhall Nova, supplemented by my partner's cars, a couple of VWs and a Ford Fiesta, inherited from her parents. But in 2005 we bought together a Renault Scenic "Fidji" – a top of the range model, with a 1.8 litre engine, air-conditioning and two sunroofs, just a couple of years old – as a suitable car for family holidays with our two school-age children.

Scenics have a mixed reputation for reliability but we have loved that car, which rarely gave us any trouble at all. I still remember sitting behind the steering wheel for the first time at the dealership, and feeling that command of the road that even a slightly elevated seating position endows. After sitting with one's backside so close to the road in a series of small saloon cars it was a revelation. Much as I hate the current vogue for bloated SUVs, I can understand the motivation: simply being able to see more of the road is a safety bonus in itself, and then there is the better view of the surrounding landscape for passengers, always assuming the ones in the back seats haven't got their noses buried in their phones or, more realistically in those days, their Game Boys.

Then there is the storage capacity. Packing for a two-week holiday with children is always a challenge with the typical European-style hatchback; it becomes more of a case of what to leave behind rather than what to take (although sometimes "who" can be very tempting, too). But with the Scenic, it was just, "all aboard, and sling it all in the hold!" Even better, with the back seats removed you have the equivalent of a light van, capable of transporting a large chest of drawers, an 88-key electric piano, or numerous IKEA flatpacks. The car even has a cellar! Well, two storage compartments in the floor in front of the rear seats.

Like a faithful family retainer, wherever we wanted to go – Norfolk, Dorset, Scotland, France – it would uncomplainingly carry whatever burden we chose to stuff into it, mile after mile, trip after trip. Until, that is, in 2019 it started to struggle up the steeper hills in Dorset, and then in 2021 our garage warned us about a worn clutch that "might go in 10, or 10,000 miles, hard to say..." So, our children having moved on into adult life, our recently-acquired and remarkably fuel-efficient Skoda Citigo took over the longer journeys, and the Scenic settled into a comfortable retirement of short, local trips, mainly shuttling rubbish and garden waste to the municipal dump.

This year, however, our Scenic finally went for scrap. It would probably have scraped through its MOT test, yet again, but after 20-plus years everything had begun to fail. The speedometer was temperamental; I had bodged-up the screen washer tubing several times in recent years to get it through the MOT; rust was setting in and much of the plastic was decaying, so that on damp days your hands came away from the steering wheel and gearstick coated with a sticky black deposit. It was a sad moment, seeing an old friend driven away on a low loader, but I try my best not to be sentimental about the inanimate and mechanical members of the family.

However, as I have written before, an inclination to invest inanimate objects with thoughts, feelings, and personality seems to be one of humanity's more indelible characteristics; what you might call an animistic cast of mind. It takes a far sterner rationalist than me to bin a favourite cup when it cracks or its handle comes off, for example. Eventually I will do it, but there needs to be a suitable period of mourning first, while the cup lies in state on a shelf. Sometimes, this can take years.

Most young children, of course, seem to inhabit a permanently liminal world, where consciousness swirls in and out of things like a tide. My daughter was particularly susceptible as a toddler, occasionally entering a state we referred to as "goggling", which involved holding her breath and trembling visibly in an open-mouthed, wide-eyed stare of rapture, as (we presumed) the toys arranged before her came to vivid life. She was our little living-room shaman. But that animistic tide keeps going out further and further as we grow, until the crucial moment arrives as so poignantly (and hilariously) captured by the Bonzo Dog Doo-Dah Band: "Mummy, teddy's stopped breathing!"

But the idea that certain categories of object acquire a personality in use is not just a vestige of childhood enchantment. New instruments need to be "played in" to develop their tone, and the quality of their final tone may well depend on the quality and character of their initial playing-in. What could be more full of personality than a pair of old shoes, and more devoid of personality than a pair of new ones? And who does not keep an assortment of pebbles, conkers and the like in their coat pockets, that gradually over the years acquire a deep patina and "pocket polish"? What? Oh, OK; just me, then.

I am convinced that cameras, too, exert some kind of influence over the pictures that emerge from them that far exceeds their mechanical functioning. You have to meet a camera half-way, get to know it, make friends, and persuade it to do its best for you. You must have noticed how awful the first batches of images from a new camera are? You can set it on "auto everything" or on full manual, you can even use a cable release, spirit level and – gasp! – a tripod, and still get rubbish. Blurry, over-exposed, poorly-composed rubbish. Yet, a few months later, if you've played it in nicely, you can even forget to check what settings you're using, as you and your camera will have finally got your harmonious act together, and the magic can begin to happen.

I'm just about reaching that point with a used Olympus E-M5 iii I bought last summer. In some weird way, I have had to exorcise the ghost in the machine installed by the previous owner, who had clearly not made friends with the camera; after all, he'd sold it on "priced to sell" not so long after he'd bought it. I think it's a bit like buying a rescue dog from the kennels: it takes time for an abusive or unloving owner's traces to be erased. Sounds nutty, I know, but you can trust me on this one.

Eventually, however, neglected objects will become disenchanted. In the back of a cupboard or the depths of a drawer, you may come across a keepsake or a forgotten item that was once in everyday use; a cigarette lighter or a fountain pen, perhaps, or a postcard from a gallery you once visited. You'll look at it, and remember why you kept it, but nonetheless know that, as sung by B.B. King, the thrill is gone. Any remaining inner spirit has finally slipped away, and you can safely bin the thing.

Sadly, though, you can't leave old cars without tax, MOT, or insurance to fully disenchant themselves in the street before scrapping them. So, goodbye, old friend... It's been great, and we won't forget you!

Sling it all in!

3 comments:

  1. Another vintage post, Mr C, although I *never* would have dreamt of reading about your fondness for a family car :-)
    I loved my Morris 1000 saloon and Morris Traveller, in the late 1990's.
    I had owned the saloon for about 4 years before parenthood. It was still fine when we had only 1 son. It was stolen from Parkway railway station, buggered up my journey home, but British Transport police kindly wrote me a chit to cover my trip from Parkway to a station closer to home in lieu of my own wheels.
    The Traveller was an even more practical option for a boy (then a second), a buggy, a bike with stabilisers and weekly loads of shopping. The Traveller was also stolen! from outside our own house! by 3 naughty nippers (about 11 years old) who took it @300 yards to a car park at the rear of a block of flats. They sat in the back smoking and eating ice-cream for a couple of hours.
    At that point I decided I really needed to have a car which wasn't even slightly tempting to thieving rascals. So, I entered the dull, character-free (to me), oh-so-reliable world of Euroboxes - a Ford Fiesta (although interest was added by a manually-opening sunroof and no power assisted steering!)
    About 2 years after the saloon Morris had been stolen, it turned up in the grittiest part of the city - it had been carefully parked in a residential road and the locals said they were surprised that it had been left so long because 'owners usually love those cars'. We tried to buy it back from the insurance company but they weren't interested in that kind of deal, so off it went, also on a low-loader, I hope to another lucky owner.
    I've seen a Morris driving around our neighbourhood recently - it's lovely to see it but I wouldn't fancy it in current road conditions and with current driver behaviours :-/.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm always amazed when I see a British car of 50s / 60s and even 70s vintage on the road or in old photos -- they look so quaint and clunky now, it's hard to imagine that's just how cars looked back then. Even the early Fiesta models look weirdly boxy. As a kid we had an Austin A40 and a Vauxhall Cresta, both impossible designs now.

      Our son's car was stolen recently off their front drive in Walthamstow. Despite the high degree of camera surveillance in London the police were "unable" to see where it went or ended up, and simply issued a crime number for the insurance...

      Mike

      Delete
  2. Meh, my Traveller was discovered because it had been left in a space covered by resident's parking permits.
    More than a year after the theft, I received a letter from the City Council parking permits department notifying me that I was being fined for wrongful parking in a permit zone. Initially, I couldn't understand what was going on - the car had been gone a while. Then I realised that the thieves had just left it there. The letter included the specific location of the car, we just travelled the 1.5 miles to find it, lots of leaves gathered around the wheels, saving the police *any* effort whatsoever.
    Lots of questions being raised at the moment about how the police serve the public.

    ReplyDelete

Comment policy: All comments are welcome, but will be moderated (i.e. read by me before publishing). This may take time. Only comments which add something constructive to the post in question (and which will be of interest to other readers) will be published. Spam will be hosed out, and its originators hunted down. Thanks.