Tuesday, 31 March 2026

Wide in Wales



Our Easter procession continues: we left Wales at the weekend, and are now in Bristol. The weather in mid-Wales was typical for the time of year; that is, we had heavy rain, light rain, fog, hot sunshine, and one day of snow. How the poor bloody sheep with their new lambs cope I don't know; no wonder they look so grumpy. Sadly for us, this was our last stay in our cottage of choice since 2011 – an excellent, eco-conscious barn conversion perched on the shoulder of a hill overlooking a picturesque valley – as the owner's son will be moving in with his two sets of twins. I'm not sure it's somewhere I'd want to bring up four children, but I wish them luck...

It's nice to have Wi-Fi and a solid phone signal again, but I'm relying on my laptop here which is not equipped with my full set of photo-processing software, so this little gallery of wide views is a sort of rough preliminary draft of what I will be doing when we get back to Southampton next week.

Obscured by clouds...

Obscured by smoke...

The next five photos are all from one lovely walk we usually make at Easter that leads up to what the Ordnance Survey map marks as a "recumbent stone", a large boulder on top of a hill with commanding views of the landscape in every direction. Whether this is some ancient ritual marker or just a glacial "erratic" (a boulder that a glacier eroded in one place, carried in its icy pockets along with tons of other rocky trash, and dumped in another place, usually hundreds of miles away) is debatable – it may well be both, of course – but it certainly feels like a place of significance: there are stone circles in the valley below and an alignment of four upright stones next to a man-made mound further along the hill.






Technical point: Actually, one thing I'm noticing using this laptop to edit these photographs is that my customary downsizing settings – 22cm long dimension @ 96 dpi for "normal" images, or 30cm long @ 96 dpi for "wide" images – result in rather smaller pictures on this higher resolution screen than what I see on my usual desktop display at home, which is quite old now. Basically, the one on this laptop is 2256 x 1504, whereas the one at home is 1600 x 900... So I really do need to reconsider these settings when I get back to Southampton. Apologies to those of you who have been struggling with postage-stamp size images on this blog forever (Hi, Kent...).

6 comments:

  1. Noice. Green. I like those "scope" frames. Especially #6. Not sure when you started publishing your images larger, but they've been pleasantly sized for some time now.

    (Of course AI is scraping all this material for future slop usage. The bigger the better as far as they are concerned. The small sized images used to be to discourage human thievery. Now it's the machines coming for us.)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's interesting to hear, Kent, what resolution is your display?

      Mike

      Delete
  2. UHD, so 3840 x 2160. But I don't use full screen for the browser. And the display resolution in macOS 15 is set to HD or 1920 x 1080, for larger text. How all that translates from one display to another via a browser is... unclear.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I suppose screen *size* is the other factor, of course. I do wish they didn't measure them diagonally... Makes the arithmetic too hard for the likes of me... ;)

      Mike

      Delete
  3. Lovely photos. I especially like the fourth one of the five set.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Paul -- I think that's the same one as Kent's no. 6, which is interesting. I'm hoping to tune these up a further notch when I get home!

      Mike

      Delete

Comment policy: All comments are welcome, but will be moderated (i.e. read by me before publishing). This may take time. Only comments which add something constructive to the post in question (and which will be of interest to other readers) will be published. Spam will be hosed out, and its originators hunted down. Thanks.